Archives for the ‘Arbitration News’ Category

Judge sides with Fisker in Tesla arbitration case

By natalie • Nov 3rd, 2008 • Category: Arbitration, Arbitration Cases, Arbitration News

It started out with allegations of stolen secrets and quickly gave way to plenty of jokes involving “bad karma” before ultimately winding up an in arbitration, and it now looks like the legal tussle between Tesla Motors and Henrik Fisker of Fisker Automotive has finally come to a close. That lawsuit, as you may recall, had accused Fisker (who worked on Tesla’s WhiteStar sedan) of stealing Tesla’s hybrid technology and using it in Fisker’s own car, the Fisker Karma. The judge in the case apparently couldn’t disagree more with Tesla’s claims, however, and has now cited “overwhelming” evidence in ruling in Fisker’s favor. For it’s part, Tesla simply said that, “we disagree with the ruling, and we’re focused on producing and shipping cars to our customers,” while Fisker is expectedly taking the opportunity to gloat a bit, saying that the ruling “completely vindicates” Fisker.



Courts disagree over manifest disregard doctrine

By natalie • Nov 3rd, 2008 • Category: Arbitration, Arbitration Cases, Arbitration News

Lovells LLP

Vikram Sidhu and Jonathan Glusman

USA
October 23 2008

A federal district court in New York City held that after the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, courts may no longer review arbitration awards for “manifest disregard of law.” In Hall Street, the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act provides the exclusive grounds to vacate or modify awards, and parties to an arbitration agreement cannot agree to expand those grounds.

Click to continue reading “Courts disagree over manifest disregard doctrine”



Vardan Ayvazyan is Named a Defendant by Internal Court of Arbitration

By natalie • Nov 3rd, 2008 • Category: Arbitration News, International Arbitration

 

On September 5, 2008, the New York base International Court of Arbitration, attached to the International Chamber of commerce, named former ROA Minister of Nature Protection Vardan Ayvazyan, presently serving as President of the National Assembly’s Economic Affairs Committee, as a defendant in a case involving the issuance of mining exploration licenses that Hetq covered in detail at the beginning of this year.


 For more information of the case in question, 14770/EBS, you can go to the Court’s website: www.iccarbitration.org. 

At the core of the matter is the gold mine in Hankavan, Armenia. While serving as Nature Protection Minister, Vardan Ayvazyan issued exploratory licenses to two companies at the same time. The actual owner of one of the companies, Golden Ore, is Andranik Manukyan, former ROA| Minister of Transport and Communication, who now serves as a presidential advisor to Serzh Sargsyan. Shortly thereafter, and in a process that involved numerous violations of the law, the Ministry of Trade and Economic Development issued the company an operating license. In quick succession Golden Ore was then sold to GeoProMining Ltd, a diversified resources holding company headquartered in Moscow. Almost immediately this company obtained the Sotk and Meghradzor gold mines owned by Indian billionaire Anil Agarwal’s Ararat Gold Recovery Company. In a word, the transaction was a package deal. 

Our informed sources tell us that the Hankavan gold mine was sold to the tune of $30 million and that the government didn’t receive one red-cent from the transaction. At least this is what the Golden Ore’s tax accounts show. 

Along with Vardan Ayvazyan, three other citizens of Armenia were named as defendants – Mayren Batoyan, Edvard Djanibekyan and Yuri Lalazaryan.

Click to continue reading “Vardan Ayvazyan is Named a Defendant by Internal Court of Arbitration”



The California Supreme Court opines on the permissible scope of judicial review of arbitration awards

By natalie • Oct 28th, 2008 • Category: Arbitration, Arbitration Cases, Arbitration News

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

David Herron, Scott H. Dunham, Linda Kwak and Shannon Gibson

USA
October 3 2008

Following on the heels of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Hall Street, the California Supreme Court also recently considered the scope of judicial review of arbitration awards in Cable Connection, Inc. v. DIRECTV, Inc., 2008 WL 3891556 (2008), and held that parties may obtain judicial review, on the merits, of an arbitration award by express agreement. This holding directly relates to the U.S. Supreme Court’s comment in Hall Street, in which it stated that its decision in that case did not reach the issue of judicial review according to state or common law.    

Click to continue reading “The California Supreme Court opines on the permissible scope of judicial review of arbitration awards”



Blackwater suit to stay in arbitration, appeals court rules

By natalie • Oct 21st, 2008 • Category: Arbitration, Arbitration Cases, Arbitration News

Click to continue reading “Blackwater suit to stay in arbitration, appeals court rules”