U.S. Supreme Court: unconscionability challenge to be determined by arbitrator, not court

By natalie • Jul 28th, 2010 • Category: Arbitration, Arbitration News
For those employers using arbitration agreements, the United States Supreme Court recently issued an interesting decision regarding who should determine the threshold issue of whether an arbitration agreement is enforceable. In Rent-A-Center West v. Jackson, Antonio Jackson sued Rent-A-Center (”RAC”) for employment discrimination, and RAC petitioned the court to compel Jackson to arbitrate his claims. Jackson opposed the petition on the grounds his arbitration agreement was unconscionable. Pursuant to a provision expressly delegating enforceability challenges to the arbitrator, RAC asserted the arbitrator and not the court should determine the issue.

Click to continue reading “U.S. Supreme Court: unconscionability challenge to be determined by arbitrator, not court”



Arbitration and insolvency law in Dubai— is there a link?

By natalie • Jul 28th, 2010 • Category: Arbitration, Arbitration News, International Arbitration
Dubai currently has no effective insolvency law. Try to imagine it: How would creditors recover their entitlements? Does it lead to more arbitration activity? Does it explain why the Dubai International Arbitration Centre received more than 300 new cases last year and why arbitration is increasingly used?

Click to continue reading “Arbitration and insolvency law in Dubai— is there a link?”



The Thai perspective— effect of bankruptcy on arbitration

By natalie • Jul 27th, 2010 • Category: Arbitration News, International Arbitration
Thailand introduced reforms to its bankruptcy laws in 1998 in the aftermath of the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Those reforms introduced business reorganisation provisions similar to the Chapter 11 provisions of the US Bankruptcy Code. Further amendments have been made to the Thai bankruptcy laws, which are now governed by the Bankruptcy Act BE 2483 (1940) as amended by the Bankruptcy Act (No. 7) BE 2547 (2004).

Click to continue reading “The Thai perspective— effect of bankruptcy on arbitration”



Supreme Court issues key ruling on mandatory arbitration and arbitrator authority

By natalie • Jul 27th, 2010 • Category: Arbitration, Arbitration Cases, Arbitration News

In Rent-A-Center, W., Inc. v. Jackson (June 21, 2010), the U.S. Supreme Court held that when an agreement covered by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) delegates the authority to determine the arbitrability of the agreement to the arbitrator, claims that challenge the enforceability and validity of an agreement as a whole will be determined by the arbitrator. Only claims that specifically challenge the enforcement of the delegation provision will be considered by a court.

Click to continue reading “Supreme Court issues key ruling on mandatory arbitration and arbitrator authority”



Rent-a-Center v. Jackson: a win for pro-arbitration employers

By natalie • Jul 27th, 2010 • Category: Arbitration, Arbitration Cases, Arbitration News
Who decides whether an arbitration agreement is unconscionable when the agreement explicitly delegates that decision to the arbitrator? According to a slim majority of the U.S. Supreme Court in Rent-A-Center v. Jackson, No. 09-497, ___ U.S. ___, slip op. (June 21, 2010), the arbitrator does, if a party challenges the enforceability of the arbitration agreement. The district court may only intervene if a party specifically challenges the validity of the agreement to delegate that decision to the arbitrator. The decision makes it more difficult for a current or former employee who has signed an arbitration agreement with a proper delegation provision to avoid arbitration and bring a private lawsuit. That is a positive result for pro-arbitration employers.

Click to continue reading “Rent-a-Center v. Jackson: a win for pro-arbitration employers”